I Shall Not Be Released: 'That's Alright By Me'
'That's Alright By Me':
Version 1: Gene Clark Sings for You (acetate, late 1967)
Version 2: Recorded early 1968, posthumously released on Flying High, 1998
What do the following songs have in common: ‘If I Hang Around’; ‘Only Colombe’; ‘Crazy Ladies’; ‘All I Want’; ‘The Daylight Line’;
‘Communication’; ‘The Wheel of Time’; ‘What is Meant Will Be’? Apart from being uniformly excellent,
all were either written or co-written by Gene Clark. More significantly, however, none were released during his
lifetime. But that was Gene: he
gave his songs a fair shot – and as we’ll see, sometimes two – and then moved
on. There were always new songs to
be written late at night around the kitchen table. For the always-prolific Clark, a comprehensive list of his
unreleased material would doubtless prove both lengthy and fascinating; indeed,
it warrants a box set of its own.
Not all songwriters worked this way. ‘Jealous Guy’ (from 1971’s Imagine) was originally titled ‘Child of Nature’ and penned three years before, during the Beatles’ trip to India; Lennon merely slapped on a new set of (superior) lyrics. George Harrison revisited and revamped old Beatles-era material on a number of occasions: ‘Beautiful Girl’ was written in ’69 and released in ’76; ‘Not Guilty’ and ‘Circles,’ both White Album outtakes, were released in 1979 and 1982 respectively. Pete Townshend never threw away a good riff. The fade of ‘Glow Girl’ (“It’s a girl, Mrs. Walker, it’s a girl”) was reconfigured to fit Tommy’s narrative structure and became ‘It’s a Boy.’ And so on.
For Gene there were, of course, exceptions to this rule. On at least two occasions that we know of he tried to remake songs when initial attempts had fallen flat, or otherwise failed to coalesce to everyone’s satisfaction. Tellingly, two such occurrences came during the vacuum of the Sings for You period (i.e. post-Gene Clark with the Gosdin Brothers/pre-Dillard and Clark).
For Gene there were, of course, exceptions to this rule. On at least two occasions that we know of he tried to remake songs when initial attempts had fallen flat, or otherwise failed to coalesce to everyone’s satisfaction. Tellingly, two such occurrences came during the vacuum of the Sings for You period (i.e. post-Gene Clark with the Gosdin Brothers/pre-Dillard and Clark).
As we saw in the earlier examination of the impeccably written/sloppily executed Sings for You demos, Gene seemed to be suffering from some sort of crisis of confidence that manifested itself in a puzzling inability to follow through on the promise of his own work – work that had obviously taken consider time and effort to compose. The songs he wrote during this period were allusive, poetic, abstruse – but the recorded results lacked this same intensity: they were at best unfocused; and at worst, reckless and shambolic. It was as if Gene had moved on from the Sings for You material before it had even been developed to its full potential. His confidence in his own work seemed to be shaken. As a result, we have two vastly different arrangements of ‘Yesterday Am I Right’ (the bizarre, jazzy, horn-driven Hugh Masekela-produced take, and the traditional ballad version from Sings For You, neither of which work); plus two stabs at one of Gene’s finest unreleased songs, ‘That’s Alright By Me.’
Lyrical Differences
The narrative in ‘That’s Alright By Me’ is doubtless
familiar to Clark fans, one that Gene turned to time and again: a
dysfunctional, on again/off again relationship between an ambitious woman and
the man who has allowed himself to become her safety net when those aspirations
come tumbling down.
As relayed in
the song, the pattern of the relationship seems to begin with intimations of
restlessness on her part that he infers as frustration with the limitations of
their present life (“So now this house has grown too small”), followed by the
declaration of a vision quest from which he assumes he’s excluded (“You say you
live now in tomorrow | And there I sense you don’t see me”). The idea that this has all happened
before is cleverly woven into the tale with allusions to a clock chiming four –
her signal to “turn again then | To take pursuit of empty dreams.” The cynicism
in these lines indicates either bitterness at her impending departure, or
weariness with the pattern of leaving/returning itself, the regularity of which
runs like clockwork. Possibly
both.
Certainly the chorus is an appeal for her to fess up about
her intention of leaving, as opposed to cloaking her plans in “nervous words
and empty motions.” Indeed, his
ability to “sense” what she’s about to do before it has even been done is our
surest sign that this is a ritual that that builds slowly – but openly and
irrevocably (“claim symptoms just too plain to pass”). But it is a cycle that has played
itself out one too many times, the tension from which results in a complete
breakdown of both the cyclical pattern and his ability to maintain the role of
safety net (“You have drained my love at last”). Indeed, the realization that his love has been drained
ultimately sends him packing too (“Tomorrow I'll be slowly moving | I can't
waste all my days the same”).
Oftentimes Gene’s breakup songs left things purposely
ambiguous, the most famous example of which was “I’ll probably feel a whole lot
better when you’re gone”). Here,
however, the kiss-off line (at least in the second version) indicates final
resolution: “Don't stop to think of where I might be | Don't stop to figure
who's to blame.”
The earlier SFY version, however, included two extra verses
that may allude to the specific reasons for her departure:
[Verse 5]
I’ll drink my last toast to your wealth, babe
I’ll break my last convicting smile
Don’t think of what you must remind me
I’m going to let you keep your style.
[Verse 6]
The asphalt’s branded old illusions
Of what you’ll be when not confined
Have taken you, so just go on now
For I’ve been coastin’, I don’t mind
The use of the words “wealth” and “style” is interesting,
and provide possible clues as to the reasons for her leaving: monetary gain.
Obviously the use of the former is a clever pun on the phrase “drink to your
health”. We drink to celebrate new
beginnings, career changes, good fortune, etc., which in this case may mean a
sudden windfall or promising opportunity has landed in her lap. But for him, the toast is one of
bitterness, a chance to break one final “convicting smile” at the end of their
relationship. She is going
somewhere and he may not follow, nor does he need to be reminded of it.
The use of the word “style” indicates a perceived commitment
to, and a predilection for, the finer things in life: presumably status, fame,
fashion, all of which had been previously characterized by him as “pursuit of
empty dreams”. His assurance that he will let her keep her style suggests he
has no interest in following her chosen path.
The “asphalt’s branded old illusion” verse that Gene also
excised from the ’68 version is merely a restatement of what has already been
said, and was probably cut for its redundancy: it did not serve to further the
narrative in any substantive way.
The idea of her feeling “confined” had already been addressed in the
first line of the song.
The most frustrating aspect of the two versions of ‘That’s
Alright By Me’ is that neither stands as definitive. Clocking in at nearly six minutes (5:44) the SFY version is
severely hampered by a clumsy drum pattern that was presumably inserted to
break up the similarity of the verses and chorus. The pattern, which features a three-beat roll across the
tom-toms, followed by a snare hit on the fourth, has a post-punk vibe that
wouldn’t have sounded out of place on a Joy Division track 12 years later, but
on this occasion only serves to trample all over the song. Moreover, the unknown drummer betrays
his own unfamiliarity with the song by missing a snare hit when he mistakenly
thought the “drained my love at last” line would head into the more
conventional pattern employed in the chorus.
Elsewhere, mellotron is put to good use in the chorus,
providing the kind of pathos and power that hints at what it might’ve sounded
like had it been given a lush orchestral backing down the line. But Gene’s vocal, however, is
uncharacteristically weak. It
wavers and cracks at crucial moments, and generally lacks the weathered
stateliness of the second attempt.
When the classy, career-spanning Flying High was released without fanfare in 1998, one of the undisputed highlights of the unreleased material was ‘That’s Alright with Me’. Recorded only months after the SFY version during Gene’s brief association with Laramy Smith and his band Phoenix, the track was one of three songs completed during this time (the others being ‘Los Angeles’ and Dylan’s then brand new ‘I Pity the Poor Immigrant’).
By the time he re-recorded the song with Smith, Gene seems
to have worked out whatever vocal problems were plaguing him on the SFY
take. His lead is controlled and
mature, dignified in a world-weary, Johnny Cash fashion. There’s also a lead guitar part with
to-die-for twang, some nicely placed and darkly atmospheric backing vocals. Moreover, the absence of a cluttered
drum pattern accentuates the forward trajectory of both the music and the narrator's resolve (“Don't stop to think of where I might be | Don't
stop to figure who's to blame”).
One can’t help but wonder, however briefly, what Dillard and
Clark would have done with the track.
But it is not for us to second-guess Gene’s decisions. He gave the song two fair passes and
never looked back. To my
knowledge, he never played the song live, nor made any attempt to resurrect it
for a later album. While it may be
the stuff of an interesting parlour game to rearrange the facts of his life
into endless “What if?” scenarios, the decisions he made cannot be changed. The
work of the artist is done. It is now up to us to sift through the work and
testify to its greatness, whether Gene saw fit to release it or not. To his credit, Gene refused to look
back.
That is our job.
Comments
I've always loved this song - but the drums ruin the SFY version, and - for me - the bass line ruins the 2nd version. If only someone had been able to produce this song correctly....
Catherine
Keep up the great work!